Writer’s Note: In 2006, I received a
Call for Papers from the Caribbean Chapter of the College English Association
(CEA-CC). They were interested in adding several papers prior to publishing the
Fall 2006 Conference Proceedings
(This Watery World: Humans and the Sea). I had been working on an essay that
explored how navigator Harold Gatty believed that the spring migration of the
Pacific Golden-plover from Tahiti encouraged northward exploration by Polynesian
mariners, which resulted in their discovery of the Hawaiian Islands.
The 2nd edition of “This
Watery World” is distributed by Cambridge Scholars Publishing in the United
Kingdom and is available from Amazon.com.
Petroglyph: Kolea (Pacific
Golden-plover),
The Discovery of the
Hawaiian Islands:
A Case of Human-Bird
Mutualism
Tom Leskiw
Humans have been, and continue to be, a
restless lot. Despite this, our self-image is one of being
semi-sedentary, especially when we consider the exploits of truly migratory
species such as caribou and wildebeest, shorebird and salmon. However, the scope
and arduous nature of non-human migration should not obscure the fact that we,
too, are a migratory species: in our daily commute to work, our weekend and
vacation journeys in search of re-creation, the flight from winter’s cold by
legions of “snowbirds,” and initially, the human race’s peregrinations outward
from our evolutionary cradle in Africa.
Since long before recorded history, humans have observed the comings and
goings of other animals. The scientific study of migration began with
Aristotle’s speculation in book eight of Historia Animalium about what
happened to swallows in winter. Today, wild creatures continue to pique our
interest as we study their migratory patterns and technology has played a
pivotal role in providing the answers to the long-standing questions of their
points of origin and their destinations.
Seas have served as barriers to travel since
time immemorial and crossing them has often entailed the crossing of a frontier.
The Hawaiian Islands—geologically speaking, mere specks of rock—are renowned as
the most isolated archipelago in the world, as they are situated 2,400 miles
from California, 2,500 miles from Alaska, and 2,240 miles from Tahiti. This
remoteness, arguably representing the ultimate frontier, prompts several
questions with regard to the ways in which they were discovered and what could
have possessed mariners to set out across the Pacific considering the
exceptionally long odds of encountering land.
Voyagers from the Marquesas discovered the
Hawaiian Islands 1,600 years ago. It was the Polynesian mariners’ intimacy with
the sea that enabled them to use a number of subtle clues for navigation:
clouds, water color and taste, wave patterns, currents, presence of seabirds,
fish, and plants, and the position of stars and planets.
Harold Gatty, the aviation pioneer whom
Charles Lindbergh called the “Prince of Navigators,” suggested that it was birds
that led ancient mariners to Hawaii. As Rachel Carson writes in The Sea
Around Us (192):
Students of primitive navigation believe that
the migration of birds had meaning for the Polynesians, and that they learned
much from watching the flocks that gathered each year in the spring and fall,
launched out over the ocean, and returned later out of the emptiness into which
they had vanished. Harold Gatty believes the Hawaiians may have found their
islands by following the spring migration of the golden plover from Tahiti to
the Hawaiian chain, as the birds returned to the North American mainland.
The plover’s migration route strongly suggested
the presence of land to the north, prompting the Polynesian explorers to sail in
that direction and eventually discover the Hawaiian Islands. As critical as
celestial navigation was to their success, it is important to note that the
correct compass heading required to reach the Hawaiian Islands from Tahiti could
only have been confirmed following successful landfall by the first
mariners.
Apparently, long-distance flights of the Pacific
Golden Plover (Pluvialis fulva) also served as inspiration to early
British explorers. In 1773, Captain James Cook sailed the waters of Tahiti
during his second expedition. He was on a mission to find Terra Australis
Incognita, the “Great Southern Continent” purported to lie somewhere between
New Zealand and Australia. Naturalists aboard the H.M.S. Resolution noted
the presence of the Pacific Golden Plover. The first recorded specimen was
collected on 26 August 1773 at Matavai Bay, Tahiti. Subsequently, the species
was first scientifically described by naturalist J.R. Forster. The Tahitians
informed Cook and his naturalists that the species did not nest in the islands,
north each spring. Cook wondered if perhaps the small shorebird might breed on
the elusive continent that he and his men were seeking.
In 1778, Captain Cook was on his third
expedition, seeking the elusive Northwest Passage. During late summer, in the
North Pacific/Bering Sea, his crew spotted a Pacific Golden Plover, which seemed
to be migrating south. Cook wondered if the birds knew something about geography
that he didn’t: “Does this not indicate,” he wrote, “that there must be land to
the north where these birds retired in the proper season to breed?”(Johnson, The
Pacific Golden Plover 140) Cook’s insight is regarded as the first written
statement by a European concerning migration in the northern Pacific region.
By the time Cook reached the Hawaiian Islands in
1776, voyages between Hawaii and Tahiti had ceased. Cook and his crew were
astounded to find a thriving civilization in such a remote location. The subject
of how a Stone-Age people, lacking compass, sextant or chronometer could have
found the islands was widely debated. Cook, for one, believed the natives had
finely honed wayfinding skills. In 1769, while in Tahiti, he took a native
sailor named Tupaia aboard the Endeavour and let him navigate the ship
300 miles south to the island of Rurutu. The expedition sailed westward on
various courses to New Zealand, then to Australia, then northward through the
Great Barrier Reef, touching at New Guinea. Throughout this entire convoluted
voyage, Cook was astonished to discover that whenever Tupaia was asked to point
out the direction in which Tahiti lay, he could do so without access to the
ship’s charts or compass.
The daily lives of Polynesian mariners
were dependent upon an intimate knowledge of the Earth’s sky and waters. The
Pacific Golden Plover, is known as kolea in Hawaii, an
onomatopoetic word that mimics the species’ three-syllable flight call. That the
explorers’ nautical knowledge should be informed by the study of this
shorebird’s annual migration comes as no surprise. What is surprising,
however, is the degree to which man’s relationship with the
kolea is mutualistic, where the
association actually benefits both species. Mutualisms have been divided
into two categories: obligate and facultative. While facultative mutualisms are
beneficial but not essential to survival and reproduction of either party,
obligate mutualisms are those that are essential to the life of one or both
associates. Information is sometimes the
currency in mutualisms, and in the case of
kolea-Polynesian explorer mutualism,
the kolea traded information (the
presence of the Hawaiian Islands) for food (expanded foraging opportunities
following colonization by man). The discovery of the Hawaiian Islands aided by
the kolea’s migration flight was a
boon to seafaring Polynesians. We will never know how many of their expeditions
navigated a course destined never
to encounter land, perishing in the process. Following the explorers’ successful
landfall, the Pacific Golden Plover benefited from the islands’ subsequent
habitat alteration. However, because man and the
kolea are not essential to the
survival of each other, their association represents facultative mutualism[1].
Native Polynesians intuited the location of the
Hawaiian islands by watching the kolea’s
spring migration. In the absence of the plover, who can say if they had been
inclined to set out to discover other lands? Many aspects of the
kolea’s life history lend credence to
Gatty’s theory. The species winters over a vast area, about half the
circumference of the Earth—ranging west to Africa and south to New Zealand and
Australia. Fossilized bones 120,000 years old found in Pleistocene lake deposits
on Oahu evidence the species’ long presence in Polynesia (James 221). The bird
is easy to locate on its wintering grounds and close studies by professional and
amateur alike are aided by the species’ attachment to a particular place, the
degree to which it exhibits site fidelity. Wintering territories are vigorously
defended, as the same individual returns each year to the same patch of grass.
For instance, a banded bird returned for 27 consecutive years to Bellows Air
Force Station in windward Oahu, a record for shorebirds. Interestingly enough,
various Hawaiian place names touch on the species attachment to a particular
site, such as Papakolea (Plover
Flats) on the Big Island and Puukolea
(Plover Hill) on Molokai.
Residents of Polynesia continue their close observations of the
kolea to this day. The “Krazy for
Kolea Kontest”—founded in 1997 by the nonprofit organization Nene O Molokai—is
held annually on that island to spot the first returning “fall” bird each
August. An interactive website, “Kolea Watch,” encourages observers to report
the spring exodus of the kolea (1).
The long tenure of humans observing the pattern in the
kolea’s spring northward migration
predates their written language. The birds’ exodus is uncannily consistent; on
Oahu, the migration starts within 2 days of April 24, making it one of the most
precise internal calendars discovered in animals. Prior to their departure for
their breeding grounds, the birds abandon their territories, gathering over a
several-day period. The flock—known as a congregation of plover and consisting
of up to 200 individuals—usually departs just prior to
dusk. The birds fly in circles or make angled ascents to a great height before
starting their northward journey (Henshaw, Migration 249).
In contrast to many long-distance migrant
shorebirds, the kolea’s numbers are
thought to be stable, not requiring special management efforts to stabilize
their population. In fact, the
kolea have benefited from the
discovery of the Hawaiian Islands in several ways. The arrival of Polynesian
explorers from the Marquesas around 400 AD unleashed a process of
deforestation and as a result, less than 50 percent of the original forest cover
remains. The conversion of forests to
grasslands has actually benefited the plover because the
kolea prefer microhabitats where
plant cover is short or absent, allowing ease of movement and relatively
unobstructed vision while on the lookout for predators (Johnson, Birds of).
New or expanded habitat niches include grazing
lands, grassy borders of airport runways, cemeteries, athletic fields, parks,
golf courses, and military bases, as well as paved surfaces adjacent to grass
and other low vegetation from which the plovers glean insects. As the lowland
forests gave way to sugar cane cultivation, the
kolea moved into cane fields,
foraging on caterpillars of two widespread and destructive cutworm species[2].
Annual sugarcane harvest followed by tilling created large, barren tracts of
land, facilitating kolea foraging
opportunities. Where suitable
habitat such as pastures occur, Pacific Golden Plover ranges to at least 2,500
meters in elevation, which furnishes foraging opportunities over a substantial
portion of each island that have experienced forest to grass conversion.
Widespread planting of ironwood (Casuarina) trees also helped the plover,
which often can be found foraging on the dense, insect-rich mats of shed
foliage. Actual scientific data on how the deforestation of the Hawaiian Islands
benefited the kolea is lacking and
can only be inferred based on the kolea’s
preference for open habitats with low-growing vegetation.
However, a contemporary comparison of
the ways in which deforestation may have benefited the
kolea can be seen in the relationship
between the recent deforestation of the Amazon and the American Golden Plover, a
close relative of the kolea. Research
has revealed that the widespread conversion of rainforest to pasture in South
America has created new habitats for migrating and wintering American Golden
Plovers (Stotz 608). Furthermore,
favorable habitats resulting from settlement in the Eastern U.S. may have
prompted some birds to eschew their autumnal migratory flight to the Amazon and
wintering instead in the United States (Paulson 121).
In contrast, evidence of the
kolea’s habituation to humans
is abundant. Flocks utilizing traditional nighttime roosting areas (beaches,
rocky points, tops of mangrove trees) are found in parking lots and on levees
and flat roof tops—the latter site also offering protection from cats (Johnson,
The Use of 45). Sites illuminated by streetlights may offer protection
from introduced Barn Owls and feral cats. In
addition, Plovers have been observed foraging on human foods such as
bread, rice, French fries, and apples, and an injured bird ate earthworms,
insects, and snails from the hand of its benefactor while in captivity. The
availability of these supplemental foods may be a factor in the species changing
its migration habit, as it is now a year-round resident on Oahu. However, the
kolea’s close association with humans
does have its price, such as the exposure to agrichemicals like those used at
golf courses and on lawns and potential human-introduced predators include
mongoose, Barn Owl, and feral house cat. A scat analysis failed to detect
kolea remains in barn owl or feral
house cats, but kolea remains were
discovered at a Barn Owl roost on Kaula Island, Hawaii.
From a historical perspective, the
kolea were utilized by the early
Hawaiians, plucking its golden feathers for capes and feathered staffs, often
without killing them. Yet while
Early Hawaiians snared the kolea for
food, plover hunting was banned in Hawaii in 1941.
Technology has unlocked a treasure trove of the
kolea’s secrets. We can now state
that this species can fly nonstop for at least 70 hours, flapping its wings
twice a second to sustain speeds up to 70 miles per hour (5). The
kolea—those that winter as far south
as Australia—are capable of flying up to 6,260 miles nonstop, even though it is
unable to glide or soar to conserve energy. The plover’s trans-Pacific flight is
made possible by the accumulation of fuel in the form of fat, increasing its
body weight by as much as 64% in the weeks prior to its migration (Johnson,
Birds of ). About one month
after the vernal equinox, kolea begin
to grow restless, each bird departing the territory it has vigorously defended
since fall. For several days, they mill about, swelling in number. Flocks form
along shoreline and grassy headland. Then, as dusk falls, the congregation—in
the ultimate act of faith—lifts off, circles, and begins its 2,500-mile flight
over the Pacific Ocean. Human eyes follow the flock until tiny specks dissolve
into darkness. To the north, a bright pinpoint of light, Hoku-paa, the
“immovable star,” shines. It is this beacon, Polaris—the North Star—that will
guide the birds’ movements through the sky for the next two nights until they
reach what the Hawaiians call Kahiki, the
kolea’s Arctic breeding grounds.
Native cultures demonstrate that technology is
but one part of the puzzle to understanding a creature. Hawaiians have long
acknowledged their debt to the kolea.
The long association with and careful observation of the
kolea has inspired its inclusion to
Hawaiian dance, song, and legend. The
hula kolea is performed in a kneeling
position, with the dancers forming a single row facing in
the same direction. Arms, heads, and bodies imitate the movements of the plover.
Still performed today, there is no instrumental accompaniment to the
kolea hula.
The 3,000-mile, nonstop flight back to their
Arctic breeding grounds requires substantial energy reserves. In preparation,
the kolea gorge on their favorite
foods; a bird weighing 110 grams in March may grow to 180 grams by late April.
Their weight gain and annual exodus were well-known to native Hawaiians and
resulted in the following chant (Pukui):
When the feathers darken on the breasts,
The kolea returns to Kahiki to breed
The kolea eats until he is fat, then returns to
the land
from which he came!
When there is a desire for plovers,
The child to be born will travel to Kahiki
The plover can only cry its own name
The egg of the kolea is laid in a foreign land.
In addition, native Polynesians regard birds as
potential gods or spirit beings. Oral histories recount how migratory birds or
those that nest in high cliffs serve as messengers for the alii (kings).
Acknowledging the part the kolea
played in the discovery of the islands, legend holds that the bird is sent,
generally in pairs, to act as scouts or to carry messages from island to island.
The trans-Pacific kolea-man
association is depicted on a 1984 U.S postage stamp commemorating the 25th
anniversary of Hawaiian statehood. A
kolea is shown in flight, ahead of a traditional Polynesian sailing vessel,
inspiring the navigators onward.
H.W. Henshaw, in his landmark 1910 paper in the
Auk, “Migration of the Pacific Plover to and from the Hawaiian Islands,”
touched on our sense of wonder for the species’ twice-annual migration. (245).
When we consider the number of miles traveled,
the widely different characters of the regions chosen for summer and winter
abodes, and the perils necessarily attending the passage between them, the
migration of no other of our birds appears so wonderful as that of the Golden
Plover.
Ecologists estimate that the Hawaiian Islands
were colonized by plants and animals at the rate of one species every 100,000
years. The slow, millwheel grinding of time and isolation produces new species,
the raw materials being storm-blown birds or floating seed pods. Exploration,
for shorebird and human alike, is evolutionarily adaptive; that is, the trait
confers an advantage to its bearer in terms of contributing to successful
survival and reproduction. As Joy Harjo--poet, performer, writer,
musician and part-time resident of Hawaii—observed, “There has to be power or
sustenance in migration or the world would be without humans, most plants and
animals.” Chickens, pigs, taro root and coconut trees are among the animals and
plants that have accompanied ocean voyagers in search of new lands to colonize.
We readily acknowledge them as our “partners in migration.” The
kolea has played a pivotal—albeit
underappreciated—role in the human exploration of the Pacific frontier.
Literature Cited
Carson, R.L.. The Sea
Around Us. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. 1950. 192
Dean, W. R. J., W. R.
Siegfried, I. A. W. MacDonald. The Fallacy, Fact, and Rate of Guiding Behavior
in the Greater Honeyguide. Conservation Biology. 4.1 (1990): 99-100.
Henshaw, H.W. Migration of
the Pacific Plover to and from the Hawaiian Islands. Auk 27.3: 245-262.
James, H.F.. A Late
Pleistocene avifauna from the island of Oahu, Hawaiian Islands. Docim. Lab.
Geol. Lyon No. 99 (1987): 221-230.
Johnson, O.W. The Pacific
Golden Plover (Pluvialis fulva):
Discovery of the Species and Other Historical Notes.
Auk 110.1: 140
Johnson, O.W., and P.G.
Connors. American Golden Plover (Pluvialis dominica), Pacific Golden
Plover (Pluvialis fulva). In The Birds of North America,
No.201-202 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Academy of Natural Sciences,
Philadelphia, and The American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington D.C.
1996[VPM1] .<http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/BNA/account/American_Golden
Plover/FOOD_HABITS.html>
Johnson, O. W., R. M.
Nakamura. The use of roofs by American Golden Plovers, Pluvialis dominica
fulva wintering on Oahu, Hawaiian Islands. Wader Study Group Bull. 31
(1981): 45-46
Kolea Watch: Student Science With Native Shorebirds. Hawaii Nature Center. 10
November 2006. <http://www.hawaiinaturecenter.org/kolea/index.html>.
Paulson, D.R., D.S. Lee.
Wintering of Lesser Golden Plovers in Eastern North America. Journal of Field
Ornithology. 63 (1992): 121-128.
Pukui,
Mary Kawena, Olelo Noeau:
Hawaiian Proverbs and Poetical Sayings. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press, 1983.
Stotz, D.F., R. O.
Bierregaard, M. Cohn-Haft, P. Petermann, J. Smith, A. Whittaker, S. V. Wilson.
The status of North American migrants in central Amazonian Brazil. Condor
94 (1992): 608-621.
[1]
There are other examples of human-bird mutualism, such as the Boran
people of Africa with a bird known as the honeyguide, where human
hunting parties are often joined by the Greater Honeyguide, Indicator
indicator, which leads them to bee colonies. When searching in
unfamiliar areas, the average search time by the Borans was reduced from
8.9 hours when they were unguided to 3.2 when they were guided and the
efficiency in locating beehives increased by 64% (10).
Borans use fire and smoke to drive off the bees, break open the
nest and remove the honey, but leave larvae and wax behind which are
left for the birds. The use of fire and smoke reduces the bird’s risk of
being stung and in turn, the humans gain accessibility to nests.
According to the Borans, the honeyguide informs them of the location of
honeybees, from the compass bearing of bird flight, the duration of the
bird’s disappearance and height of perch and by the “indicator call.”
There are indications that this association has originated quite some
time ago: pictographs indicate that humans have collected honey in
Africa for 20,000 years. Birds and Borans can survive without the other,
but because each benefits from their association, this
is also an example of facultative mutualism (Dean 99-100).
[2] On
a different register, a more recent manifestation of the benefits
derived from the mutualistic relationship with the kolea is through the
biocontrol of agricultural pests such as cutworms, grasshoppers,
beetles, grubs, roaches, and semi-poisonous millipedes.
Some of these pests are considered to have a substantial adverse
economic impact upon a variety of agricultural products that include
sugar cane.
[VPM1]Please
cite online version.